Match a job Paths Subjects Questions Quizzes Pricing
Overview Read Practice

Practice — Ranking & Recommendation System Architecture (5 questions)

Pro content

Sign up free, then start a 14-day Pro trial — no card needed.

Intermediate Open Free

Sizing the Funnel from a Latency Budget Permalink →

A video platform has a catalogue of 50 million videos. The ranking model costs 8 μs per (user, item) pair when batched, and the overall request budget (feature fetch + retrieval + ranking + re-ranking) is 120 ms p99.

  1. Show why scoring the full catalogue with the ranker is infeasible, with numbers.
  2. If feature fetch takes 15 ms and re-ranking takes 5 ms, how many candidates can the ranker afford to score within budget, and what does that number tell you about the candidate-generation stage's job?
  3. Candidate generation returns candidates from 4 sources (two-tower ANN, item-to-item, trending, subscriptions) with some overlap. Why is that better than relying on the two-tower source alone?

Share this question

Advanced Open Pro

In-Batch Negatives and Popularity Bias in Two-Tower Training

Unlock this question →
Advanced Open Pro

Computing NDCG and Diagnosing a Ranking Regression

Unlock this question →
Advanced Open Pro

Cold-Start Design for New Users and New Items

Unlock this question →
Advanced Open Pro

Explaining an Offline Win That Fails Online

Unlock this question →

We use cookies for product analytics to improve OmniAtlas. See our Privacy Policy.