Paths Subjects Questions Quizzes Pricing Search
Intermediate Open Free

The Point Where You Stop Correcting and Start Over

You've corrected Claude Code twice on the same bug in the same session, and the second fix just reintroduced part of the first one.

Per this subject's "two-corrections" rule, what should you do next?

Solution

The correct answer is "/clear, then write one better prompt with what you learned."

Once the same issue has been corrected twice, the context is carrying several failed approaches that keep influencing the next guess — a third correction inside that same polluted session tends to compound the problem rather than escape it. A clean session with a single precise prompt that bakes in what the failed attempts revealed outperforms continuing to patch. Switching models or asking Claude to explain its own failures first are both still operating inside the same polluted context, which is exactly what the rule says to leave.

Share this question

← Back to Claude Code Best Practices: Reliable, Cheap, High-Leverage Sessions practice

We use cookies for product analytics to improve OmniAtlas. See our Privacy Policy.